Sun System Handbook - ISO 3.4 June 2011 Internal/Partner Edition | |||
|
|
Solution Type Sun Alert Sure Solution 1001279.1 : Two-Node Cluster Directly Connected to a StorEdge 6920 System May Experience a SCSI Reservation Panic
PreviouslyPublishedAs 201739 Product Sun StorageTek 6920 System Bug Id <SUNBUG: 6230109> Date of Workaround Release 03-MAY-2005 Date of Resolved Release 29-NOV-2005 Impact When both nodes of a two-node cluster are directly connected to a Sun StorEdge (SSE) 6920, the SSE 6920 may not handle the release of SCSI-2 (FC-AL) disk reservations properly. The SSE 6920 may become inaccessible, and one of the two cluster nodes may return a "SCSI reservation panic" on bootup. Contributing Factors This issue can occur in the following release:
Note: This issue can only occur when both nodes of a two-node cluster are directly connected to the SSE 6920. To verify the Storage Service Processor Image revision:
The system processor version can be determined from "/etc/release" with the following command (run on the SP): [sp0]# cat /etc/release Solaris 9 s9_58shwpl3 SPARC ... Sun StorEdge(tm) 6920 Version: 2.0.2 Symptoms Cluster node host will experience a SCSI reservation panic on bootup. Workaround To work around this issue, use fibre channel switches between the cluster nodes and the SE6920 and have all the SAN connections operate in fabric mode (which can be confirmed with a simple status check at the fibre channel switches). To perform this workaround, do the following:
Complete details of this process can be found in "Sun Cluster 3.x With Sun StorEdge 6920 System Manual for Solaris OS" at http://docs.sun.com/app/docs?q=817-6747-11. Resolution This issue is addressed in the following release:
Information for upgrade procedures for the 6920 can be found in the following document: http://www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/hardware/docs/pdf/817-5229-14.pdf
Modification History Date: 29-NOV-2005 29-Nov-2005:
Previously Published As 101678 Internal Comments The version 2.0.6 was dropped as there was a lack of customer's awaiting this release. Therefore bug 2123693, will not be fixed, since there are no more 2.x releases on the books. The fix was implemented in the 3.0.0.16 build, and is in either of the current releases of the 6920(3.0.0.25 or 3.0.0.30). The bug for this fix is actually 6230109. Internal Contributor/submitter [email protected] Internal Eng Business Unit Group NWS (Network Storage) Internal Eng Responsible Engineer [email protected] Internal Services Knowledge Engineer [email protected] Internal Escalation ID 1-6965641 Internal Sun Alert Kasp Legacy ID 101678, 57770 (Sun Alert) Internal Sun Alert & FAB Admin Info Critical Category: Availability ==> Pervasive Significant Change Date: 2005-05-03, 2005-11-29 Avoidance: Upgrade, Workaround Responsible Manager: [email protected] Original Admin Info: [WF 29-Nov-2005, Dave M: upgrade, resolved, re-release] This document has been imported from KMS Creator and may need adjustment before re-publishing. This imported document has been reviewed/adjusted by: Review Name: Review Date: The following field(s) have been migrated with dummy values and need adjustment: Original Product: Sun StorEdge 6920 Migrated Product: SunTea v3.55 (Dummy) Original KMS Creator attributes below: --- PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY CHANGES BELOW THIS LINE! --- Sun Alert ID: 57770 Synopsis: Two-Node Cluster Directly Connected to a StorEdge 6920 System May Experience a SCSI Reservation Panic Category: Availability Product: Sun StorEdge 6920 BugIDs: 2123693 Avoidance: Workaround State: Committed Date Released: 03-May-2005 Date Closed: Date Modified: Escalation IDs: 1-6965641 Pending Patches: Resolution Patches: FIN: FCO: Date Submitted: 15-Apr-2005 Submitter: [email protected] Responsible Engineer: [email protected] Responsible Manager: [email protected] CTE group: NWS Responsible Writer: [email protected] Distribution: Contract SunSolve Workflow History: WF State: Issued, 03-May-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: sending for release WF State: Draft, 03-May-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: sending for release WF State: Draft, 03-May-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: no further comments; OK by Roberta, send for release this afternoon. WF State: Draft, 02-May-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: no further information from submitters; sending for review 1:00pm WF State: Draft, 28-Apr-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: approved by BU, waiting on additional information from submitters; received 1/2, need output for Symptoms WF State: Draft, 27-Apr-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: waiting on additional information/corrections from submitters WF State: Draft, 26-Apr-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: Bill replied 2pm - still waiting on more comments for final approval. WF State: Draft, 26-Apr-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: requested approval status from Roberta's people (she is on vacation) WF State: Draft, 22-Apr-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: Have not heard anything back yet for approval from team members Bill Stearn and Mark Keener WF State: Draft, 22-Apr-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: Roberta is going on vacation next week, she assigned approval to team members Bill Stearn and Mark Keener WF State: Draft, 20-Apr-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: waiting on BU approval (Roberta) WF State: Draft, 18-Apr-2005, David Mariotto WF Note: Article created. Exported from KMS Creator Sat May 21 09:17:52 2005 GMT, [email protected] Internal SA-FAB Eng Submission Two-Node Cluster Directly Connected to a StorEdge 6920 System May Experience a SCSI Reservation Panic Product_uuid 67794720-356d-11d7-8ef2-ce2ac2bc9136|Sun StorageTek 6920 System Attachments This solution has no attachment |
||||||||||||
|