Sun System Handbook - ISO 3.4 June 2011 Internal/Partner Edition | |||
|
|
Solution Type Problem Resolution Sure Solution 1018948.1 : Sun Fire[TM] Serengeti: System Board power on generates "JTAG part 0x91a0: Substituting version 0x3 for version 0x4"
PreviouslyPublishedAs 230806 Symptoms On a Sun Fire[TM] Serengeti Server, the following error could occur when powering on an UltraSparc (US) IV+ System Board: sc0:SC> poweron sb2 Nov 21 10:56:37 sc0 Platform.SC: JTAG part 0x91a0: Substituting version 0x3 for version 0x4 Nov 21 10:56:38sc0 Platform.SC: RegisterDB part 0x91a0: Substituting version 0x3 for version 0x4 Resolution The message indicates that the current version of System Controller Application (ScApp) firmware does not recognize a newer hardware revision of USIV+ CPUs installed on the board being powered on. It shows that ScApp treats the CPUs as a revision it does recognize instead. Functionality is unaffected by the notification and action so the message can be completely ignored. However, the "resolution" is to install ScApp 5.19.4 or higher, which is programmed to recognize the newer revision automatically. Relief/Workaround Ignore the message. It is harmless. Product Sun Fire V1280 Server Sun Fire E6900 Server Sun Fire E4900 Server Sun Fire E2900 Server Sun Fire 6800 Server Sun Fire 4800 Server Internal Comments Several different revisions of USIV+ (Panther) CPUs are used on 1.5GHz Boards. Panther 2.1.1 was first used at GA and Panther 2.2 was later. Prior to 5.19.4 a SB with Panther 2.2 CPUs will error when powering on because ScApp is not aware of the module type. That error is harmless, and can be ignored as explained above. Relevant CRs: 6347015 Add support for Panther 2.2 4724693 More specific messaging is required when unrecognized components are detected JTAG, 1500, panther, RegisterDB, Serengeti, USIV, USIV+, usiv+ Previously Published As 83628 Change History Date: 2006-02-08 User Name: 25440 Action: Approved Comment: Publishing. Version: 3 Date: 2006-02-08 User Name: 25440 Action: Accept Comment: Version: 0 Date: 2006-02-08 User Name: 103287 Action: Approved Comment: Ken and I worked the document over a bit to make it available to a contract audience and hopefully allow it to prevent cases from being opened against this "non-issue" issue. Please do the KE review on this and publish. Thanks, JFreeman (and Ken) Version: 0 Date: 2006-01-23 User Name: 24214 Action: Approved Comment: Thoughts... We also should probably sit on this until Panther 2.2 comes out. Ken Version: 0 Date: 2006-01-23 User Name: 24214 Action: Created Comment: Version: 0 Product_uuid 6a74b2f9-bbd8-4b2c-870d-b6b73d6e224f|Sun Fire V1280 Server 4fe39727-0599-11d8-84cb-080020a9ed93|Sun Fire E6900 Server bed24aa9-0598-11d8-84cb-080020a9ed93|Sun Fire E4900 Server 63ff680d-0598-11d8-84cb-080020a9ed93|Sun Fire E2900 Server 29da7938-0a18-11d6-8a41-9ed1ad6d6779|Sun Fire 6800 Server 29d3a694-0a18-11d6-92da-df959df44cdd|Sun Fire 4800 Server Attachments This solution has no attachment |
||||||||||||
|