Sun System Handbook - ISO 3.4 June 2011 Internal/Partner Edition | |||
|
|
Solution Type Problem Resolution Sure Solution 1003876.1 : Sun StorEdge[TM] A1000/A3500 array: Failure of a single LUN can render the entire array inaccessible.
PreviouslyPublishedAs 205440 Symptoms A LUN failure on a Sun StorEdge[TM] A1000/A3500 array, may cause volumes on Note: For RAID 0, a single drive failure could result in a LUN failure. For RAID If the described issue occurs, messages similar to the following will be seen Aug 7 03:40:52 xxx unix: WARNING: /sbus@3,0/QLGC,isp@2,10000/sd@4,1 (sd60): In the above example, "sd60" is the RAID0 volume which is unavailable upon a When this occurs, the target driver used to keep re-setting the target, which is Resolution This is a known issue(bug 4511840) in the target(sd/ssd) driver, which was
This is an old bug, so it is recommended to apply the latest rev of these NOTE: The fix for this bug was integrated in Solaris 9 OS. Product Sun StorageTek A3500 Array Sun StorageTek A3000 Netra st A1000 Array Sun StorageTek A3500 FC Array Sun StorageTek A1000 Array Internal Comments
Service Request ID: 10732362 A1000, A3500, A3500FC, 0x84, Hardware Error Previously Published As 82441 Change History Date: 2005-09-08 User Name: 18392 Action: Approved Comment: Did some additional formatting. Version: 4 Date: 2005-09-07 User Name: 86700 Action: Approved Comment: Hi Geoff, I have added what you requested in the document. It is in the parenthesis where we mention LUN failure. I havnt changed anything else. I didnt feel it was necessary as no matter what RAID we have, if the LUN is inaccessible, we would face this problem but as it was requested, I have done the needful. Am putting it back in your queue so please let me know if everything is ok now. Thanks and regards, -Sailesh Version: 0 Date: 2005-09-06 User Name: 18392 Action: Rejected Comment: Added product name, product noun, trademarking, added STM, did some re-wording and formatting. The bug report seems to indicate that there are different results depending on the RAID level. This is not made at all clear in the document. Please check the bug report as to what should be added. Version: 0 Date: 2005-09-06 User Name: 18392 Action: Accept Comment: Version: 0 Date: 2005-09-06 User Name: 84756 Action: Approved Comment: Accurate document for the A1000/A3500 storage arrays. Thierry Version: 0 Date: 2005-08-24 User Name: 84756 Action: Accept Comment: Version: 0 Date: 2005-08-24 User Name: 86700 Action: Approved Comment: Hi KE, This issue is old but unfortunately, we are still getting escalations on it and since it causes the whole array to come down, I thought of making it a SRDB. Please do the review and let me know if it requires modification. -Sailesh Version: 0 Date: 2005-08-23 User Name: 86700 Action: Migrated Comment: apollo 1-10981876 2005-08-08 Version: 0 Product_uuid 2a8022d4-0a18-11d6-8043-ee5a180fdb7f|Sun StorageTek A3500 Array 2a7ca41a-0a18-11d6-82f2-e96014c515ea|Sun StorageTek A3000 49f7ad4a-aa28-47c7-935a-b971312469ea|Netra st A1000 Array b648cdf0-efb8-4d4f-93d4-b17c1baf1935|Sun StorageTek A3500 FC Array 2a792916-0a18-11d6-8d0a-c3d03933af3c|Sun StorageTek A1000 Array Attachments This solution has no attachment |
||||||||||||||||||||
|